|
|
|
Entire Site Copyrighted 2001 by Spiral Sea Enterprises |
|
||||||
| . |
|
. | . | . | |||||
| . |
|
||||||||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | ||||
| . |
Zines: Where to from here?
And now, on to the grass roots level of concern:
No doubt you have heard of SFWA (Science Fiction Writers of America--also referred to as "Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America" by a faction to whom the distinction matters--to me, the initials "SF" have long since lost their strictly hard science overtone, if they ever possessed it). SFWA is the premiere "pro" writer group in SF&F these days, founded by Damon & Kate Wilhelm Knight and a core of other SF&F writers back in the early-mid-60s. The organization manages the Nebula Awards, and does a very creditable job of representing the general interests of a fair portion of SF&F writers to the publishing industry, amongst other notable activities. Its unpaid officer staff, board, committees, and few paid admin staffers work hard at keeping alive a world-wide organization which has had, at its heart, the intent of cheering on and supporting the creative individuals giving their lives to sf arts, and that art to the world. Some matters are afoot which the Reader/Writer-ship of Spiral Sea may want to think about--perhaps even come up with some input on... Matter of fact, we may want to get other sister/brother academic publications and Zines involved, as well. (Recent climb-aboard: Nature, the Journal.) The dawn of electronic publishing is long past, of course. (I'd put it about ten minutes ago, in relative terms.) Still, e-publishing and Zines are barely seven years old, unless you count some of the earliest, really raw efforts of a few computer geeks back in the late 80s and early 90s. But these days Zines are multiplying like crazy; and as for other forms of professional presentation, take a look at NATURE, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, TIME, NEWSWEEK, THE NEW YORK TIMES, and a host of other once ink-&-paper only communications media. For the nonce, we will deal only peripherally with the large publishing houses' free products. For the most part, they have adopted the attitude that, free online availability of what limited content is provided for free is an advertising write-off. E-publishing for them is a marketing tool leading to sales of their ultimate product, hard print, video, audio, or other conventional products that are well-defined within their profitable business models. What we are concerned with are Zines. Publications which, like Spiral Sea, offer creative content with little hope of it being pay-as-you-go, much less profit-as-you-go. The content ranges from poetry and fiction to philosophy, research, exposition and propoganda, with an equally wide range of motivations behind those promoting and actually paying for and staffing the presentations. Some of these Zines are very good. All are publishing the work of writers, young & old, who have otherwise decided not to fight to hawk their wares in the highly overcrowded souks of the "pro" publishing markets, academic or commercial. Some of these Zines are, candidly speaking, not that good, being assembled by often younger, less experienced or less gifted amateur editors, from a pool of writers of widely different abilities. Yet, all are providing a very valuable service to the world community--just doing so with differing levels of professionalism (or amateurism, as the case may be). Most writers (even old farts like myself) think that this explosion in the means of developing amateur writer audiences is not just a good thing, it is a GREAT thing. Our next generations of writers (and editors!) will have had much more on-stage exposure than we ever did--the whole Wired world, after all! It cant help but improve both the numbers and quality of the Next Generations. Also, the Zine movement is providing an amelioration of the unfortunate tendency of a "mature" genre to become locked up by a few editors, publishers, and commercially-driven product purveyors, whose tastes in plot and substance seem to be becoming more jaded every year. As evolution biologists are fond of pointing out, when selection pressures dramatically change, there follows an explosion of new species, giving rise ultimately to those new forms from which will emerge the new dominant denizens of the evolving world. The Web--or more precisely, the entire communications industry--is rapidly and surely providing exactly that kind of turbulent evolutionary stage for SF, and indeed, all of our many methods of communicating ideas of all sorts. The problem is this: Making a living at writing is becoming, paradoxically, more and more difficult, even as the means of reaching audiences are becoming easier and more widely available. At the risk of oversimplifying, this is so because the publishing industry, as it existed prior to, say, 1990--the paying publishing industry, wherein a writer might hope to clear something better than minimum wage for his efforts--was based on modest markets growing huge, whose needs were met by a relatively few writers with access to the printing presses. The advent of amateur publications has made available lots more published material, much of it able to be read for free. This has cut into the potential paying audience for the pro publishing houses. Coupled with this (and probably even more important) has been the parallel, incredible increase in other forms of SF-oriented entertainment purveyors (movies, TV & games), distracting would-be readers from SFs simplest (arguably "purest") product, the written word. And, to widen the impact, every reader, of any genre or discipline, is being equally distracted by greater choice. As a result, the pro markets have been consolidating, cost-cutting. Pro SF magazines have been folding faster than dinosaurs before an asteroidal impact blast front, to be replaced by new publications with lower pay scales, longer reply times, and smaller circulations. Paperback publishers have dropped SF and Fantasy lines, and some have maneuvered themselves toward positions where they can more dictatorially call the shots in writer-publisher contracts. SF/Fantasy writing at the moment, in other words, is becoming not just difficult to make a living at, it is rapidly becoming impossible to do so for all but a dwindling per centage of writers. There are several schools of thought about this situation. The doomsayers think it will only get worse for writers. More and more writers are appearing, cranked out by SF- degree- granting programs, or just born from interested amateurs who try for the gold ring. There aren't enough paying markets to support their work. The optimists allow that, after a period of tumultuous change, things will restabilize, driven by market forces. The publishing industry, they point out, never really has been stable. "You should have heard the hullabaloo after Gutenberg." Change has always marked societies' communications manifestations. But, after the world rebuilds its nervous system in the new digital/ cable/ satellite rubric, economic niches will become more apparent. Supply and demand will reach an accomodation. To me, these viewpoints are not opposites. They are identical.  |
. | . |
In response to such worries, there are some well-meaning groups who think that unionizing writers, in the same way that the Screen Actors Guild and other entertainment industry representative groups have organized, is a necessity for "protecting writers interests." There are some powerfully persuasive arguments for this viewpoint, which I won't go into here. The recent Supreme Court case, Tasini vs The New York Times, will become the rallying point for these efforts. (See our addendum editorial for references and details.) I do, however, urge all Zine readers, writers and editors, to examine them with the seriousness that they are due. (The rest of us will likely be content to live with the fallout, mostly because we'll have to.) Other groups believe that writing--and SF in particular--is basically a highly individualistic pursuit; that many of its best ideas came from people who are just passing on important insights gained elsewhere, who would never fit well into a union-style rubric. That market forces will act, anyway, often in ways not predictable by either the publishers or the writers. And that the loose confederations of writers already in existence (such as SFWA), should remain just that, loose confederations. Drawn together where battle must be joined, to be sure, but not straight- jacketing their memberships with highly exclusory rules of admission and dogmatic adherence to some kind of party line. This group sees a danger in a "Cold War" developing between publishers and writers, which might backfire against the writers, since there are now apparently so many of us that we compete for scarce marketing slots at each other's expense. And, equally possible, might backfire against the publishers, since there are now so many means available to make creative output available. I am sure there are other ways to describe the melee. So what, if anything different, do we do about it all? If Isaac were here, he'd point out that, when he started writing for John W. Campbell, he was lucky to get $20 for a story. (Yes, an uninflated $20, about equal in purchase power to $300 today, for some items.) In spite of his legendary prolificacy, writing only became a major income for The Good Doctor much later... and he still saw it necessary to obtain gainful employment at Boston University as a professor of biochemistry. (Of course, he liked the job, too. It gave him a captive audience, and access to the idea-generating, supporting infrastructure of academia.) Robert Heinlein was a Navy man and an engineer, before finding his futurist calling, and he was assisted at times by a financially independent and supportive wife. Arthur Clarke was a university professor and remains a physicist and professional speaker... The list goes on. You get the picture. Even for the legends, they didn't start out thinking of writing as their mainstay. They wrote ANYWAY. Self- perpetuating Entertainment- Industrial Complex- style writing careers were latecomers to the scene. Even so, Asimovs, Clarkes and Heinleins were, are, and always will be rare. The rest of us will settle down to whatever pace of creativity we are able (usually barely) to support, and our ideas will conflux with the other idea- transmission mechanisms of our world, and the dance will continue, with us observing from the sidelines much of the time. OK. Cosmic overviews are nice. Everybody wants to be able to glimpse the forest with relation to the mountains, sky and stars once in awhile. But meanwhile, we do need to find a few tree-stars to chew on at dinnertime. So, how can we make online e-publishing p.a.y.? Computing machines still cost a thousand bucks and more (though that's changing). Each writer has to have one, now. His editor may have two or three, plus is supporting, somehow, a website or three. The Software industry is at this moment undergoing yet another revolution, beginning the attempt to make us rent software per-use as a kind of eternal private utility payment, and as tools go, it was never cheap in the first place, unless you wrote the programs yourself, used freeware/shareware, or stole them. (Another topic, another time.) How can this new online nucleus of SF&F- generation/ distribution entities called Zines function for longer than it takes the first couple of transistors to burn out or code lines to obsolesce? Electrons don't rattle around those silicon- and- metal propogation chutes for free, y'know! As it has begun, the government was behind funding the Internet's development, and still supports its function in many, many ways, some obvious, and some quite subtle, if not downright devious. Commercially, those little Java applet ads running on your web pages can dig up a few bucks here and there, but no one... NO ONE... claims to be making much money at ANY current market- oriented method of exchange available on the net today. (And yet the organism continues to grow.) Still, this cannot and will not continue. Change in most industry comes usually in painful spasms, kept as far apart as humanly possible by every imaginable sort of business operations/ legalistic/ personal- life contortion in the repertoire of its leadership. The publishing industry is about to endure one of its most wrenching yet, by most observers' lights. A change, in spite of hyped prognostications, hardly yet begun. Though they don't like to admit it, publishing mavens DO NOT KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT. There are so many other forces at work--from a world tottering on the brink of the outbreak of widespread anarchy-producing terrorism; to a financial global market so newly-born that none of its creators or practitioners have yet gotten their footing; to a political and social scene not yet come to grips with the most powerful destabilizing forces ever faced: world-wide: viz., organized drug pushing, AIDS, and dwindling easy energy resources; to the slipping resolve of governments to maintain the literacy of their citizens (and subsequently losing their citizens' informed involvement in the governing process, a prelude to the rise of new forms of despotism, and certainly a failure of democracy in any meaningful sense)... Whoa, as Michael J. would say. Heavy! Given the magnitude of uncertain- ties facing us as SF-providers--probably not a new thing under the sun, just quicker in lethal economic effect these days--what kinds of things can we do to contribute to our own survival as an idea-purveying species? I've got a few ideas. But I'm much more interested in hearing those of the readership/writership of SPIRAL SEA and her sister and brother Zines. Whether we like to admit it or not, the coming world of publishing, education and entertainment is already in our hands. Wouldn't this seem to be a good time to use the communications means we have already developed, as platforms from which to hash out some assessments of the future we are already all- too- unconsciously building? Hey, we wouldn't want to grow lazy and idle, with nothing else to do but lay around and read Zines all day, right!? In the coming issues, we will print articles and discussions representing the viewpoints of Readers, Writers, Editors and Producers of Zines, E-books, and other entertainment/ education modes, on the topic of our common future. And we'll certainly go afield from the concentration on SF&F. Your input, regardless of where you fit within the spectrum of roles, is highly valued. This is an important, formative time for that complex social life form, the Online Reader/Writer. Let's hear your voice! NEXT ISSUE: your input & feedback, and a piece from a Publishing Industry insider. Send your contributions electronically, or query if you propose to send physical items, prints or manuscripts. See our SUBMISSIONS page for specific instructions. Also, our CONNEXIONS page provides links to other websites with potential relevance to your favorite topics.  Paying the bills As with any enterprise providing a service to its practicioners, Spiral Sea achieves its global presentations through the use of modern technology. In support of making that means available to our authors and artists, we pay the bills--in part through earnings from our Catalog [still in development!] of relevant and irrelevant products and services offered by ourselves, our members, and a select few outside parties. By all means, check them out. The commercial products of a culture tell us much about its spirit and direction. |
. | . | |||
| . |
 |
. | . | ||||||
Submissions
Subscriptions
- Join The Spiral Sea's growing list of e-mail subscribers -- Receive an e- mail message each time we post a new issue, or discover important information that may impact you, your interest group or community. Just click on the active core galaxy to sign up. Spiral Sea will not release our e-mail lists to any other party.
Site© 2001 Spiral Sea Enterprises,All Rights Reserved. Other trademarks & copyrights are the properties of their declared holders. Sitemap | Privacy Policy | E-mail us | Partners | Contact Webmaster